If we wanted our textual content to be unreadably tiny,
X-fetish.tube we would have instructed our browser to display it that manner. This one mugs viewers with 20" and 21" screens particularly onerous; since most fonts are scaled for 72dpi they're already 30% smaller than they should be at 100dpi. Anybody who use these tags for working text needs to be compressed by 30% themselves, slowly, and ideally in a machine with huge nasty spikes.
masturbation with Javascript There's a big class of Javascript annoyances perpetrated by individuals whose capability to do chopping and pasting exceeds their negligible sense of taste. Of these, certainly one of the commonest is the script that scrolls textual content in the Netscape status line. To all the disadvantages of this one provides the fact that you simply cannot see where links go any more. Better than that, pages with 25K of Javascript followed by
pointless use of Java There's one factor worse than your average garden-variety idiot internet designer, and that is the half-clever idiot who loves to ring in all the most recent technology without stopping to consider its side-effects. One infamous Fortune a hundred website, when it detects a Netscape browser, assumes you will need to be able to help a fancy Java search applet - and when you've got Java turned off for safety reasons, you can't search the site, as a result of the perfectly adequate CGI search you'd get in the event you had been utilizing Lynx has been disabled. Moral: Keep It Simple, Stupid!
pop-up home windows Some significantly irritating designers have found the magic formula that causes your browser to spawn a new window whenever you click on on a link - or worse, methods to make pop-up home windows appear even when all you are trying to do is exit their wretched hive of scum and villainy as rapidly as yow will discover the Back button. Stay in your individual window, dammit! The net is alleged to be about viewer control; designers who persist in rudely grabbing items of the viewer's screenspace with out permission deserve to be lashed with knouts.
menus made solely from image maps Clue: tons of people use textual content-solely browsers like lynx, either because they need to (for velocity) or as a result of they need to (visual impairment, or lack of a graphics show). An entire web page that shows up solely as "[ISMAP]-[Image]" is useless. Designers who cannot be bothered to not less than present a link to an alternate textual content menu are, at the very least, responsible of laziness and thoughtlessness. Huge image-maps are bad even for graphical browsers; they're gradual-loading and needlessly frustrate customers. And a annoyed consumer is a gone user.
sound and video that launches without prompting About these embedded movies that simply suddenly start playing by default, without bothering to ask you if you'd like them to be played? No. If in case you have adverts in your site, fine, but if my loudspeakers out of the blue begin yelling about how I can win a ONE THOUSAND Dollar Gift CARD if I simply TAKE THIS SURVEY NOW you possibly can take it to the financial institution that I'd sooner lick sores at a leper colony than answer your survey or ever do any enterprise with you. And here is a trace to everyone who runs porn websites: most individuals who watch porn don't need the sounds of people having intercourse broadcast to everybody within a thirty-foot radius.
CSS that units mounted-size fonts dimensioned in pixels That is the idiot internet designer's favourite method to make a site unreadable on a monitor with a finer dot pitch than the one he/she occurred to make use of. Guess what happens while you set a ten or 11px font on a 72dpi monitor and it will get seen on a 120dpi monitor? That's right, immediate eyestrain and one other consumer cursing your title. This drawback goes to get worse as displays get larger and finer-grained.
CSS that modifications the hotlink colors Isn't it fun when you surf to a page and your eyes stall out making an attempt to figure out which piece of text are hotlinks? That underlined blue and purple are helpful navigational cues in the online jungle. If the page has multi-coloured links or links that aren't simply distinguishable, then this is another case where overriding the browser's settings ought to be punishable by intimate acquaintance with a flensing knife.
Forcing one in every of background and textual content color, but not each. Suppose I like my pages to default to inexperienced text on a black background? (Yes, I actually got e-mail from a reader who does this!) If you happen to set your textual content color to black, however do not set the background color, the location might be unreadable. For those who set your background colour to white (or worse nonetheless, orange - this has happened too!) but do not set the textual content coloration, I'll develop eyestrain and wish a plague of creeping horrors on you. It isn't smart to assume that the viewer has not fiddled with the default settings on their browser; both set both colours or neither.
background MIDI, Flash, Shockwave, and other abominations Background music takes endlessly to load, and isn't portable. Flash and Shockwave take perpetually to load, aren't portable, and are proprietary codecs that lock you into a single vendor. Once you insult your viewers with crap like this, don't anticipate them again.
